tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6185799493173313368.post3349064025909236364..comments2023-06-06T14:51:33.442+02:00Comments on Wh's Behind: A Good Malware Decoy vs VirusTotal based on MD5 CollisionPumohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04207790063179554011noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6185799493173313368.post-73872937847697226842010-09-30T09:59:14.990+02:002010-09-30T09:59:14.990+02:00I've made a new check todays submitting same M...I've made a new check todays submitting same MD5 file and got two different answers.<br />1- http://www.virustotal.com/file-scan/reanalysis.html?id=1c4ff4e490b15b2b214f26c5654decccbcbea9eb900f88649dc7b1e42341be56-1285832735<br />2- http://www.virustotal.com/file-scan/reanalysis.html?id=fad878bd261840a4ea4a8277c546d4f46e79bbeb60b059cee41f8b50e28d0e88-1285832757)<br />So I'm wrong about that...but I'm quite sure made the same test before. Tks for your commentsPumohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04207790063179554011noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6185799493173313368.post-11268495231982352552010-09-01T13:26:19.418+02:002010-09-01T13:26:19.418+02:00hi,
have you seen the result? even tough virustot...hi,<br /><br />have you seen the result? even tough virustotal is show md5sum on the page, but actually the result are different.<br /><br />and according to virustotal author, 'already checked' result at virustotal is based on sha256, not md5 ==> http://twitter.com/jcanto/status/22603559764xandahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03741878026484423963noreply@blogger.com